Phenolic Foam (Closed-Cell Fire-Rated) vs Rigid Polyurethane Foam (low density 32 kg/m3)
Property comparison of Phenolic Foam (Closed-Cell Fire-Rated) and Rigid Polyurethane Foam (low density 32 kg/m3), both foam.
| Property | Phenolic Foam (Closed-Cell Fire-Rated) | Rigid Polyurethane Foam (low density 32 kg/m3) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density | 40 kg/m³ | 32 kg/m³ | -20% |
| Thermal conductivity | 0.02 W/m·K | 0.026 W/m·K | +30% |
| Specific heat | 1,300 J/kg·K | 1,500 J/kg·K | +15% |
Difference is Rigid Polyurethane Foam (low density 32 kg/m3) relative to Phenolic Foam (Closed-Cell Fire-Rated). Values are taken from the representative row of each material; both materials may have multiple heat treatments or conditions on their individual pages.
Identification
- standard
- EN 13166
- standard
- ASTM
What else is in Engineering Database
AI built for engineering. Searches the engineering database, performs calculations, gives source-backed engineering insights.
Get started for free ↗Reference Data375 engineering tablesMaterial properties, pipe and shape dimensions, code tables, and electrical ratings across mechanical, civil, chemical, electrical, materials, and manufacturing engineering.
Browse dataCalculatorsDeterministic engineering calculatorsSizing, checking, and conversion tools that run against the reference tables. Inputs are code-compliant, outputs are traceable to the source standard.
Browse calculators