Carbon Foam (Graphitized High-Conductivity ORNL/PocoFoam type) vs Phenolic Foam (Closed-Cell Fire-Rated)
Property comparison of Carbon Foam (Graphitized High-Conductivity ORNL/PocoFoam type) and Phenolic Foam (Closed-Cell Fire-Rated), both foam.
| Property | Carbon Foam (Graphitized High-Conductivity ORNL/PocoFoam type) | Phenolic Foam (Closed-Cell Fire-Rated) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density | 280 kg/m³ | 40 kg/m³ | -86% |
| Thermal conductivity | 145 W/m·K | 0.02 W/m·K | -100% |
| Specific heat | 710 J/kg·K | 1,300 J/kg·K | +83% |
Difference is Phenolic Foam (Closed-Cell Fire-Rated) relative to Carbon Foam (Graphitized High-Conductivity ORNL/PocoFoam type). Values are taken from the representative row of each material; both materials may have multiple heat treatments or conditions on their individual pages.
Identification
- standard
- ASTM C177
- standard
- EN 13166
What else is in Engineering Database
AI built for engineering. Searches the engineering database, performs calculations, gives source-backed engineering insights.
Get started for free ↗Reference Data375 engineering tablesMaterial properties, pipe and shape dimensions, code tables, and electrical ratings across mechanical, civil, chemical, electrical, materials, and manufacturing engineering.
Browse dataCalculatorsDeterministic engineering calculatorsSizing, checking, and conversion tools that run against the reference tables. Inputs are code-compliant, outputs are traceable to the source standard.
Browse calculators