Part of Engineering Database. 375 reference tables, deterministic calculators, and Engineering AI. Sign up free
Home/Compare/Carbon Graphite/Carbon Fiber Pitch-based High Modulus (K1100 / Thornel) vs Expanded Graphite (Compressed Flexible Sheet rho~1.1)

Carbon Fiber Pitch-based High Modulus (K1100 / Thornel) vs Expanded Graphite (Compressed Flexible Sheet rho~1.1)

Property comparison of Carbon Fiber Pitch-based High Modulus (K1100 / Thornel) and Expanded Graphite (Compressed Flexible Sheet rho~1.1), both carbon graphite.

Carbon Graphite5 compared properties
PropertyCarbon Fiber Pitch-based High Modulus (K1100 / Thornel)Expanded Graphite (Compressed Flexible Sheet rho~1.1)Difference
Tensile strength2,410 MPa8 MPa-100%
Density2,130 kg/m³1,100 kg/m³-48%
Thermal conductivity600 W/m·K200 W/m·K-67%
Specific heat710 J/kg·K720 J/kg·K+1%
Coefficient of thermal expansion-0.000002 1/K0 1/K+100%

Difference is Expanded Graphite (Compressed Flexible Sheet rho~1.1) relative to Carbon Fiber Pitch-based High Modulus (K1100 / Thornel). Values are taken from the representative row of each material; both materials may have multiple heat treatments or conditions on their individual pages.

What else is in Engineering Database

Related comparisons

View each material