Home/Reference Data/Fin Efficiency/straight#triangular

Fin Efficiency: straight#triangular

Fin efficiency (eta) vs dimensionless parameter mL for straight, annular, and pin fins — rectangular, triangular, parabolic, and conical profiles

Mechanical Engineeringpk: straight#triangular3 rows
pkmL valueL definitionefficiency etafin profilefin typeformulageometry descriptionm definitionnotestip condition
straight#triangular0fin length1triangularstraight(1/mL)*I1(2mL)/I0(2mL)Straight fin triangular profile tip thickness zerosqrt(2h/(k*t_b)) where t_b is base half-thicknessProfile t(x)=t_b*(1-x/L). Tip naturally insulated. I1 I0 are modified Bessel functions first kind. Lower efficiency than rectangular at same mL.insulated
straight#triangular0.2fin length0.9805triangularstraight(1/mL)*I1(2mL)/I0(2mL)Straight fin triangular profile tip thickness zerosqrt(2h/(k*t_b)) where t_b is base half-thicknessProfile t(x)=t_b*(1-x/L). Tip naturally insulated. I1 I0 are modified Bessel functions first kind. Lower efficiency than rectangular at same mL.insulated
straight#triangular0.4fin length0.9277triangularstraight(1/mL)*I1(2mL)/I0(2mL)Straight fin triangular profile tip thickness zerosqrt(2h/(k*t_b)) where t_b is base half-thicknessProfile t(x)=t_b*(1-x/L). Tip naturally insulated. I1 I0 are modified Bessel functions first kind. Lower efficiency than rectangular at same mL.insulated

This is a sample. Search the full fin efficiency dataset and 300+ more by creating a free account and accessing the database.

Get started for FREE

Related data