PEEK 30% Carbon Filled vs PEEK 30% Glass Filled
Property comparison of PEEK 30% Carbon Filled and PEEK 30% Glass Filled, both polymer.
| Property | PEEK 30% Carbon Filled | PEEK 30% Glass Filled | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength | 210 MPa | 170 MPa | -19% |
| Elongation | 1.5 % | 2 % | +33% |
| Elastic modulus | 18,000 MPa | 10,000 MPa | -44% |
| Poisson ratio | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0% |
| Density | 1,400 kg/m³ | 1,490 kg/m³ | +6% |
| Thermal conductivity | 1.1 W/m·K | 0.36 W/m·K | -67% |
| Specific heat | 1,100 J/kg·K | 1,250 J/kg·K | +14% |
| Coefficient of thermal expansion | 0.00002 1/K | 0.000025 1/K | +25% |
Difference is PEEK 30% Glass Filled relative to PEEK 30% Carbon Filled. Values are taken from the representative row of each material; both materials may have multiple heat treatments or conditions on their individual pages.
Identification
- standard
- ASTM
- standard
- ASTM
What else is in Engineering Database
AI built for engineering. Searches the engineering database, performs calculations, gives source-backed engineering insights.
Get started for free ↗Reference Data375 engineering tablesMaterial properties, pipe and shape dimensions, code tables, and electrical ratings across mechanical, civil, chemical, electrical, materials, and manufacturing engineering.
Browse dataCalculatorsDeterministic engineering calculatorsSizing, checking, and conversion tools that run against the reference tables. Inputs are code-compliant, outputs are traceable to the source standard.
Browse calculators